Hi Gabriel,
the community wrote already a lot of aspects and I agree with most of
them.
You are right, that we don't make big progress on the spec. itself. A
lot of cool features, that vendors implemented as extensions could get
unified in an Open311 2.0 release.
Unfortunatly, we are just a bunch of people, that work on similar
problems but have limited amount of time (beside their original
projects).
Thanks to @Philip there is some life in our community, but I guess for
most users, it's mostly an catalogue of ideas. So we also lack of good
and uniform open implementations on client- and serverside. @Thomas
approach was the first time that we became a nice mashup to improve and
adapt our featureset. And unfortunatly, open311 doesn't seem become an
standard to exchange issue tickets between different management
softwares for various public services....
But anyway, open311 is out there and it's IMHO the first step towards
delivering real world services to the citizens. It won't be a last step
to solve this kind of problems, but it forms a community of interested
devs around the globe :-)
kind regards from Germany,
Matthias Meißer
>>> "Gabriel" <<email obscured>> 16.11.2018 16:18 >>>
Hi everyone,
Please excuse me for my ignorance. But does Open311 still supported, or
does anyone still works actively on it? Could anyone let me know of what
the next steps of Open311 are?
I think it's a great initiative!
――
View topic http://lists.open311.org/r/topic/5QoKPzGP3zYt1X6oFHrDqq
Leave group mailto:discuss@lists.open311.org?subject=Unsubscribe
Start groups https://OnlineGroups.net
the community wrote already a lot of aspects and I agree with most of
them.
You are right, that we don't make big progress on the spec. itself. A
lot of cool features, that vendors implemented as extensions could get
unified in an Open311 2.0 release.
Unfortunatly, we are just a bunch of people, that work on similar
problems but have limited amount of time (beside their original
projects).
Thanks to @Philip there is some life in our community, but I guess for
most users, it's mostly an catalogue of ideas. So we also lack of good
and uniform open implementations on client- and serverside. @Thomas
approach was the first time that we became a nice mashup to improve and
adapt our featureset. And unfortunatly, open311 doesn't seem become an
standard to exchange issue tickets between different management
softwares for various public services....
But anyway, open311 is out there and it's IMHO the first step towards
delivering real world services to the citizens. It won't be a last step
to solve this kind of problems, but it forms a community of interested
devs around the globe :-)
kind regards from Germany,
Matthias Meißer
>>> "Gabriel" <<email obscured>> 16.11.2018 16:18 >>>
Hi everyone,
Please excuse me for my ignorance. But does Open311 still supported, or
does anyone still works actively on it? Could anyone let me know of what
the next steps of Open311 are?
I think it's a great initiative!
――
View topic http://lists.open311.org/r/topic/5QoKPzGP3zYt1X6oFHrDqq
Leave group mailto:discuss@lists.open311.org?subject=Unsubscribe
Start groups https://OnlineGroups.net